Kratovo man stabs police officer mid-intervention: prosecutors want the 40-year-old detained
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
13.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
13.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
14.09.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
While the entire artificial-intelligence industry talks about how „smart" its agents are, one company is making money on the opposite question: where these agents lie, cheat and fail to finish the job. Patronus AI has just secured 50 million dollars (about 46 million euros) in a new funding round.
The idea is simple but was missing. Patronus builds simulated digital worlds - copies of real sites and internal systems - in which AI agents are tested before they're let loose in the real world. Much like how self-driving cars are trained in synthetic simulations before they hit the street. The goal is to catch the moment an agent „cuts" a corner instead of completing the task properly.
The round was led by the Greenfield Partners fund, with participation from Lightspeed, Datadog and Samsung, bringing total funds raised to 70 million dollars. The company was founded by former Meta researchers in 2023, and its revenue has grown 15-fold in a single year. Its clients include almost all the leading AI labs.
„We want to create an environment where you can set loose an agent that will work for 10 hours, 10 days or 10 weeks," says founder Anand Kannappan. Investor Glenn Solomon is more blunt: „Patronus is really good at catching the tricks and at holding the models accountable."
Here lies the broader lesson. When someone makes 50 million checking whether other people's AI systems actually work, it means one thing: the industry itself admits its products aren't as reliable as the ads claim. Patronus's biggest competitor isn't another startup, but the internal teams of the AI labs themselves - the ones who should be doing this, but evidently aren't doing it well enough.
The latest 10 news from this category
A scientist at the same company puts the probability of human extinction above 10 percent within the next decade. The...
The president called in while the event was running, and the man who makes the chips answered that there would...
No virus attached, no suspicious file. Just a box that looks like the "I am not a robot" check and...
A researcher quit because the firms are gambling with our lives. Instead of denying it, Anthropic confirmed it - with...
Write a sentence, get a game. Until now it worked only in New Zealand, now in Belgrade too. Creators on...
When the two biggest firms in an industry ask for rules on how fast anyone may run, the rules rarely...
Not a single password fell. What fell was the assumption that a request from a government domain is automatically a...
The biggest names in mathematics have signed a letter against the AI labs. The dispute is not whether the machine...
Five campaigns, 200 million exchanges, and the defences fell to a request for a Japanese translation. The industry that harvested...
The hackers were inside for a whole year. The company confirmed it only after a journalist found his own licence...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.