Expert witness at the Puls trial: the change-of-use application had to come from the owner, not the tenant
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
25.08.2026
24.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
25.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
25.08.2026
24.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
26.08.2026
25.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
26.08.2026
25.08.2026
24.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Six years after the collapse, the "Eurostandard Bank" case finally enters the courtroom. The Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime has filed an indictment against businessman Trifun Kostovski, his son Kosta and two other people for causing bankruptcy and negligent operation. The damage to creditors is estimated at over 27 million euros. Kostovski hit back immediately - and loudly.
Via Facebook, Kostovski said he was one of the bank's shareholders and had no interest in seeing it fail: "A man who had a personal, business and life interest in the bank surviving, not collapsing." He directly attacked prosecutor Katerina Kolarevikj as well. A defendant publicly addressing the prosecutor before the trial even begins - that's a move that tells you the battle won't be a quiet one.
The fall of Eurostandard Bank in 2020 left hundreds of creditors with lost money - people and companies who trusted an institution meant to safeguard their funds. The indictment comes only now, six years later. And here's the Balkan question that always repeats itself: why does justice for big financial cases arrive so slowly, when an ordinary citizen is chased for a smaller debt within a few months?
The case will be a test for financial justice in the country. Will someone really answer for a bank that collapsed and swept away millions, or will it slip through years of delays, appeals and statutes of limitations like so many others? Kostovski has the right to a defense and the presumption of innocence - but the creditors who lost everything have the right to an answer. The question isn't only who is guilty, but whether the system even knows how to process cases like this to the end. Experience so far doesn't inspire much hope.
The latest 10 news from this category
When your potential litigants come in as your investors, the copyright dispute gets settled in the boardroom rather than the...
Oura is heading to the stock market at a valuation five billion higher than last year. The same week, a...
Fifty million dollars in seed capital, twelve employees and a 27-billion-parameter model that beat the frontier systems. And the founder...
A startup that grew out of a university lab in 2020 now has orders from private companies and from the...
The company was not seeking investment - the board met, messages started flying and two days later it was worth...
Founded by people who came from SpaceX, the company builds hypersonic weapons faster and cheaper than the traditional defence contractors....
Also spun out of Rivian, promised electric bikes, and the first edition ran months late. Investors piled in with another...
In December it was worth 5 billion, in July 10.3, now 21. The product is the same as it was...
Same company, half the valuation in twelve months. Nvidia first took the founder and the team, now it comes in...
The Commission promised investments „in the coming weeks”, and the first deal was announced the next day. Who decides where...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.