Five Fire Fronts in One Night Near Raec: The Mayor Sounds the Alarm on Facebook, Prevention Is Once Again a Topic for September
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
02.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
01.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
MP Antonio Milošoski accuses public prosecutors Islam Abazi and Katerina Kolarević of deliberately leaving the State Audit Office (DZR) reports out of the investigation into the purchase of fuel oil worth 167 million euros for TEC Negotino. In other words - according to Milošoski, this isn't an investigation. It's a simulation.
Milošoski's main claims are concrete. First, the prosecutors leaned on statements from "unprofessional and incompetent" individuals, instead of the formal DZR reports. Second, in 2024 the State Audit Office established that the fuel oil had come from a different supplier than the one agreed between ESM, the thermal plant and the approved vendor. Third, ESM's technical services confirmed the presence of impurities in the fuel oil, which caused problems with the plant's equipment.
Despite all these documented problems, an amended contract pushed the total amount to 167 million euros. Milošoski is asking the Council of Public Prosecutors to investigate whether the prosecutors made an oversight or deliberately ignored the documents. "The public deserves the truth," he said.
On the other side of the argument, prosecutor Kolarević stated that in March 2026, technical representatives of ESM and TEC Negotino testified that procedures had been correct and contracts fully respected. ESM has announced an appeal, claiming the technical staff don't have the economic expertise to assess financial damage.
The Balkans know this kind of case by heart. An energy company buys fuel from an unregistered supplier, the audit office files a report, the prosecution "investigates" for several years, then the whole thing goes quiet. But 167 million euros isn't a small loss. That's almost 10,000 euros per Macedonian citizen that somebody routed into somebody else's pocket - and nobody answers. Where's the money now? And why do investigations like this in Macedonia always end as a "technical oversight" with no one to blame?
The latest 10 news from this category
Mickoski promised clean water perhaps as soon as today. The two parties accuse each other of silence - while the...
Of everything announced at the briefing, the procurement claim is the most checkable. „There will be elections when they run...
The statements talk about friendly relations. The composition of the delegation talks about a gas interconnector, a rail corridor and...
Tanja Mileva has 197 points, the highest rating among judges. The Council voted nine to two for the other candidate....
Macedonia already has a Permanent Mission with an ambassador and dozens of diplomats. Osmani is asking for the mandate of...
SDSM wants criminal liability and names the officials one by one. Mickoski answers with 400 old complaints. Both can be...
The anti-corruption commission flagged a high risk. The opposition blocked it over a signature on the Albanian text. Gashi withdrew...
Bar exam passed seven months before graduation, a traineeship two years before the law degree. The Judicial Council calls it...
DUI says the government is „smuggling” the law through. Vlen says DUI is breaching the Ohrid Agreement. Parliament goes on...
Government and opposition both say the protocols are not part of the framework. Sofia says the opposite. The 2022 EU...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.