Supreme Court: Kamčev has no right to 1.5 million euros in the Reket case - legal cases close, but the money stays in the fog
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
28.04.2026
27.04.2026
27.04.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
30.04.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
32 percent - that is the coverage of cervical cancer screening in Macedonia, according to the latest analysis from the ESE association. The target set in the health strategies was 70 percent. The gap between 32 and 70 is - human life.
Cervical cancer is one of the most predictable malignancies. It is almost entirely linked to HPV. There is a vaccine. There is screening. There is treatment in early stages. In other words - this is a disease that can be stopped before it even starts.
But in Macedonia screening is not enforced in practice. The system is available - but without active outreach, without tracking women by age, without an integrated database. Gynaecologists recommend tests. Women postpone them. The health insurance fund does not call them. The cycle has been the same for decades.
The outcome is predictable. Cancer cases are detected in late stages, when treatment is expensive, brutal, and often unsuccessful. Women die from a disease that, in countries that built proper screening, barely exists anymore. Bulgaria, for example, has 70 percent coverage. Croatia over 60.
ESE is calling for integrated national screening. It is not expensive - there are international models. But it requires political will, which in Macedonia is in shortest supply for healthcare, because what is preferred are visible, progressive-looking initiatives. Cancer screening does not open stadiums. It does not cut ribbons. It does not host press conferences with declarations. It only saves lives. And in this kind of public discourse market, that is not enough.
The question health institutions have to answer: how many women have to die before screening becomes the standard? We already have the numbers - 32 versus 70. What is left to calculate is how many lives have been lost because of those 38 missing percentage points.
The latest 10 news from this category
Sharp knife, hot pan, and the contrast between raw and seared. Tataki isn't a menu, tataki is discipline.
A space as big as a mat, a time as long as 20 minutes, and a body that thought it...
Ten seconds a side, a sharp knife and fresh tuna from the market. The whole technique is in the discipline,...
Neuroscientists say the brain has forgotten boredom, and Instagram serves us other people's plans as personal punishment. This isn't a...
The juice goes into the tea, the rest into the bin. Mistake. The peel, the leaves, even the syrup -...
Same dilemma: you eat clean, but your body is not working. Endocrinologist Dr. Iris Mercedes de Luna says the mistake...
Spain's MasterChef just published a book of family recipes - and one of them isn't Spanish, isn't Italian, isn't Balkan....
The pop icon has announced a new album for July - but the question is how a 67-year-old body holds...
Nutritionists have concrete numbers - and the smell test almost always reacts too late.
Sleep specialists explain the phenomenon that hits every third person and that almost nobody understands properly.