Wolf Captured in the Middle of Kozle, Skopje: Kept on a Chain Like a Pet, Now Heading to the Zoo
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
12.05.2026
12.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
12.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
12.05.2026
11.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
13.05.2026
12.05.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The details coming out of the San Francisco courtroom are more interesting than most of this year's tech news. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, in his testimony told a scene no Silicon Valley screenwriter would invent - Elon Musk in 2017 was considering handing OpenAI over to his children, in case he died while controlling the company.
The testimony is part of Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, in which he accuses the founders of having „stolen a charity" by transforming it into a commercial structure. Altman responded that he found the framing itself hard to grasp - and reminded the court that OpenAI still has a substantive charitable foundation that continues to operate.
The key moment in his testimony was precisely that 2017 episode. Musk had been discussing succession of power inside the company, and Altman read that as a red flag. „A concentration of power of that scale", as he later put it, was in his view in direct contradiction with OpenAI's core mission.
Altman didn't hold back from professional criticism either. According to him, Musk didn't understand how to run a research lab: „I don't think Mr Musk understood how to run a good research laboratory". The management style Musk used at Tesla and SpaceX - with brutal engineer rankings and periodic „purges" of the weakest - according to Altman destroyed the working atmosphere when transplanted into a research environment.
Even so, the relationship wasn't completely cut off. Musk was kept informed about Microsoft's 2018 investment - the moment when OpenAI was already heading down the commercial path with or without him. Altman even described a scene in which Musk, at one such meeting, showed him memes on his phone.
For readers still looking for „who's the good guy and who's the bad guy" in this story - the answer doesn't exist. The two founders of OpenAI are clashing over something they once dreamed of together. Musk says OpenAI gave up on its principles. Altman says Musk only ever wanted absolute control. Whichever is true, what is fact now is that OpenAI has closed its series of transformations and emerged as the largest player in artificial intelligence. And that's why the trial is still being heard.
The latest 10 news from this category
Booking, Expedia, Viator and Trip.com are the first round of partners. ByteDance isn't building a system - it's building a...
Musk promises cheaper computing in orbit, Google is talking to everyone in parallel. Project Suncatcher has its first satellite due...
Apple resisted RCS for years, regulation finally won. The green and blue bubbles now have a padlock - beta is...
From 12 to 18 billion euros in 11 months. The war in Ukraine has turned European defence tech into the...
Thinking Machines Lab tries a new trick - a model that does not wait its turn. Demo or real change?...
Amazon adds a Clips vertical feed following Netflix and Disney. It's not a trend - it's fear.
Polish intelligence publishes a report with no hedging. Moscow is breaking infrastructure, the Balkans has no similar document. Is anyone...
250 billion to buy it, an IPO on the horizon, and a company that, instead of training frontier models -...
Polish services announce it: five water plants compromised, with potential to poison the supply. The same PLC controllers run here,...
30 billion from Nvidia into OpenAI. Another 10 into companies that are its customers. Analysts call it a circular investment...