Supreme Court: Kamčev has no right to 1.5 million euros in the Reket case - legal cases close, but the money stays in the fog
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
28.04.2026
27.04.2026
27.04.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
01.05.2026
30.04.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
02.05.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Arben Taravari is demanding a change to the wording on the memorial plaque for the defenders from Vejce. The disputed words are "Albanian terrorists". The request was made public - and in one move pulled the cover off one of the most painful subjects in Macedonia.
The plaque at the barracks marks the spot where members of the Macedonian security forces were killed in the 2001 conflict. The text still names the attackers as "Albanian terrorists". For many on the Macedonian side, that is a historically accurate formulation. For many on the Albanian side, it is an offensive generalisation that stigmatises an entire ethnic community.
Nikola Misajlovski, meanwhile, paid his respects at the plaque without saying a word about the text. The two gestures - Taravari demanding change, Misajlovski silent with flowers - say everything about the state of Macedonian-Albanian relations in 2026. Twenty-five years after the conflict, neither side has a shared version of what actually happened.
What does "Albanian terrorists" mean? In legal terms - people who carried out an armed attack against state institutions. In political terms - a formulation that bundles everyone involved into a single label, without distinction. Is the problem the word "terrorists" or the word "Albanian"? That is the real question.
Across Europe, memorial plaque texts are often changed after a decade. Germany, France, Spain - all of them have rewritten their formulations multiple times as historians offered different interpretations. The Balkans does not do this. Here, texts are carved once and stand as sacred.
The result is what we see today - Taravari's request, Misajlovski's silence, and zero progress in understanding the past. If this country cannot find a common language for what happened in 2001, how will it find one for the future? The question is rhetorical. The answer is in the eyes of every young person leaving this country - convinced that no shared future is going to be built here.
The latest 10 news from this category
Trenčevska says there are ministers with Bulgarian passports inside the Government. Not VMRO, not SDSM, not Brussels should decide the...
When a prime minister says „from last to first place", he is talking about a document. When a citizen waits...
6 million euros in damages on MEPSO, fictitious contracts. If documents back this up, it isn't a political fight -...
Skopje's strategy is shifting. Identity questions will not be a condition for the EU. Sofia gets the signal: we're ready,...
100,000 euros in bribes, garages tied to the agriculture minister's family, and an operation that was left open. The answer...
A 34-year-old economist from Strumica, first term, now independent. Talk of corruption and broken institutions is standard fare - but...
A month away from cabinet sessions. Photos from Thailand. The PM is grooming him to be the special envoy in...
Five Albanian parties merge into one organisation. Stability or centralisation? When there are only two serious players on the Albanian...
The Albanian political bloc is trying to close the front of internal division. The question: will a single party hold...
In a country that has racked up more election complaints than clean elections, the claim is not political hyperbole -...