Skopje Taxi Drivers on the Verge of a Protest: Unlicensed Meters and Drivers Without Permits
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
17.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
17.06.2026
16.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
18.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
18.06.2026
17.06.2026
16.06.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Arben Taravari is demanding a change to the wording on the memorial plaque for the defenders from Vejce. The disputed words are "Albanian terrorists". The request was made public - and in one move pulled the cover off one of the most painful subjects in Macedonia.
The plaque at the barracks marks the spot where members of the Macedonian security forces were killed in the 2001 conflict. The text still names the attackers as "Albanian terrorists". For many on the Macedonian side, that is a historically accurate formulation. For many on the Albanian side, it is an offensive generalisation that stigmatises an entire ethnic community.
Nikola Misajlovski, meanwhile, paid his respects at the plaque without saying a word about the text. The two gestures - Taravari demanding change, Misajlovski silent with flowers - say everything about the state of Macedonian-Albanian relations in 2026. Twenty-five years after the conflict, neither side has a shared version of what actually happened.
What does "Albanian terrorists" mean? In legal terms - people who carried out an armed attack against state institutions. In political terms - a formulation that bundles everyone involved into a single label, without distinction. Is the problem the word "terrorists" or the word "Albanian"? That is the real question.
Across Europe, memorial plaque texts are often changed after a decade. Germany, France, Spain - all of them have rewritten their formulations multiple times as historians offered different interpretations. The Balkans does not do this. Here, texts are carved once and stand as sacred.
The result is what we see today - Taravari's request, Misajlovski's silence, and zero progress in understanding the past. If this country cannot find a common language for what happened in 2001, how will it find one for the future? The question is rhetorical. The answer is in the eyes of every young person leaving this country - convinced that no shared future is going to be built here.
The latest 10 news from this category
While there was no money for higher wages and subsidies, there was for a celebration with David Guetta. Every government...
Investment in modernization isn't an abstract phrase - it's money from the same treasury that funds salaries and healthcare. Whose...
A marathon has no deadline - and that's exactly what makes it politically useful. What does this government concretely offer...
Behind the question of names always stands a bigger question of identity and symbols. But did anyone ever ask the...
Every government, after every debate in Brussels, comes out with the same sentence. The problem is the perspective has lasted...
While the parties are busy with who is whose satellite, the questions that affect the citizen are left aside. Labels...
According to the opposition, two firms got nearly 36 million euros in tenders over two years. The citizen who pays...
The region tried to present itself as part of the solution, not the problem. But the Balkans already have an...
Each side accuses the other of selling the country to some neighbouring capital. And the citizen, trapped between the two,...
A tectonic move in politics. But leaders who have ruled for decades know how to step back in a way...