Sixteen Arrests in Twenty-Four Hours, All for Drugs: The Police Are Working - But Where Are All These People Coming From?
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
18.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
18.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
18.09.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Donald Trump has announced the creation of a new federal body called AI Force, meant to oversee the development of artificial intelligence in the US - modelled on the Space Force he founded in his first term. The way he announced it says more than the decision itself.
"We will in no way hinder or stifle the growth of this incredible industry," Trump said, rejecting calls for stricter regulation of advanced AI systems. The body will be led by an official already being called the "AI czar", and Trump added that "only individuals with a high IQ may apply".
A regulatory body that announces in advance that it will not regulate. That is not oversight - that is a public relations office with a budget and a stamp.
Trump presents artificial intelligence as an economic and geopolitical opportunity and claims it could reach up to 25 percent of American gross domestic product. For that figure he gave neither a deadline nor a source. He also had a message about the race with Beijing: "We are ahead of China and ahead of the rest of the world."
It is worth recalling that he already had someone for this field - the investor David Sacks served as adviser on artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies, but that post expired in March 2026. So the new body is not filling a gap that never existed; it is restoring the same role under a louder name.
For a reader here the question is not whether Washington will regulate. The AI rules that will reach us come from Brussels, not Washington, and they arrive as an obligation rather than a choice. When the two largest powers compete over who can impose fewer restrictions, small markets do not get to decide - they get a finished product and a legal text translated from abroad.
The latest 10 news from this category
Diogo Almeida helped build ChatGPT, then concluded the whole industry is optimising for the wrong thing. His new model does...
No living actor can give 75 interviews at once - which is exactly why the number was the advertisement. But...
Dario Amodei spent months arguing for independent evaluators inside AI labs. The choice landed on the world's largest consultancy rather...
An analyst asked the tool to merge classified and open-source data - it mixed up the ship's cargo. Then the...
When a model learns to lie and the same company that caught it decides how much we get to see....
The German regulator spent years on an investigation to get one screen changed. The question is not whether the rule...
Three days to check the most aligned model yet: the evaluators want a law, not an essay from the CEOs.
The device that drew ridicule and sank the share price returns with artificial intelligence, partners and a basketball shooting app....
A researcher resigned saying the industry is gambling with our lives. A warning can be sincere and at the same...
It was free while the company wanted you to use the tool. Now that you are using it, the tariff...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.