30 days' custody for the fan who knocked a child unconscious outside "Jane Sandanski": how did two fan groups end up right at the entrance?
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
01.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
01.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Two Russian Su-35S fighter jets collided in mid-air over the Kursk region, and one pilot was killed. The report came from the Moscow Times, citing a Russian Telegram channel. As of publication, the Russian defence ministry had issued no official statement.
This is where the story gets interesting. The same Telegram channel that announced the pilot's death indirectly blamed Ukraine, with a message that Ukrainians "will answer for this." Kyiv confirmed no involvement of any kind. So we have a channel simultaneously reporting that two of its own aircraft crashed into each other - and that the enemy is to blame for the crash.
The most powerful thing they have, after the Su-57
The Su-35S is not an old aircraft falling apart from fatigue. It is a fourth-generation multirole fighter, among the most capable in Russian aviation - only the newer Su-57 sits above it. It carries the Irbis radar system and can launch R-37M air-to-air missiles with a range of up to 300 kilometres.
Two such machines flew into each other. Not shot down, not hit from the ground - they collided. That is a data point that says more about the state of flight training and air traffic over the war zone than any official report.
The losses are stacking up on other counts as well. On 2 September Ukrainian forces destroyed a MiG-29 near the Millerovo air base and a Ka-27 helicopter near the Yeysk base. Before that, Ukrainian drones hit the Shagol base in the Chelyabinsk region and damaged four aircraft - two Su-57s, one Su-34 and one more of the Su type.
Chelyabinsk is deep inside Russia, thousands of kilometres from the front. When drones get that far and fighters collide with each other over their own territory, the picture that emerges is not one of airspace under control. The question is how long an army can lose aircraft on two fronts - to the enemy, and to itself.
The latest 10 news from this category
Washington strikes, Tehran hears explosions, oil jumps - and the president insists there's no war. The Balkans have long known:...
Washington has scheduled the next trilateral meeting, Europe will wait in Brussels, and Moscow and Kyiv want completely opposite things....
An American commentator announces a nuclear strike by 7 November, and a respected magazine writes about new attacks right after...
Over 250,000 terminals at the front and one man with a switch. If that can happen to Ukraine in the...
A convoy corridor in Oleshky - and in the next breath the Kremlin says combat operations continue. The Balkans know...
Two Belarusians arrested in Germany, a European arrest warrant for a Ukrainian. Hybrid war has no front line - it...
The ceasefire took effect at 3 a.m. A few minutes later, Russian ballistic missiles were flying towards Kyiv. That's what...
Trump says Zelensky is a harder partner than Putin. Behind the scenes, American intelligence is sending Kyiv strike data and...
One dead, three missing, and no official cause. Before it, in October alone, drones attacked at least seven cargo ships...
Security guarantees and ten years of funding for the army - that's Kyiv's price. Putin, meanwhile, doesn't want a short-lived...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.