Six Men Brawled Outside the Police Station in Kočani: Now They'll Also Check What the Officers Were Doing
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
16.08.2026
15.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
16.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
16.08.2026
15.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
17.08.2026
16.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
17.08.2026
16.08.2026
15.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
While everyone races to put a camera on your face, one startup bets on the opposite. Even Realities has unveiled its G2 smart glasses - no camera, no speakers, just a display that shows you text in front of your eyes. The company has just become a "unicorn" with an estimated value of one billion dollars after a 150-million investment led by China's Meituan and Tencent. The bet is clear: productivity instead of filming everyone around you.
Technically, the glasses weigh just 35 grams, have a monochrome display with greenish text visible in any light, four microphones and a battery that lasts up to two days. They cost 599 dollars (about 555 euros). They handle scheduling, reminders, live translation between languages, step-by-step navigation and come with a built-in voice assistant. In a word - a small computer on your nose, but one that films no one. And that's exactly the point.
The difference from Meta and its Ray-Ban glasses with a camera isn't accidental - it's the whole story. When you wear glasses with a camera, everyone around you becomes a potential recording without being asked. Even Realities deliberately dropped the camera and says: privacy is a feature, not an oversight. In a world where every device wants to watch and listen to you, glasses that promise not to record you sound almost rebellious. The question is whether the buyer wants a work tool or a toy for content.
For the European user, this is more interesting than it looks. While EU regulators wrestle with glasses that record everything, a device without a camera sidesteps most of the privacy debate up front. Whether the market will reward restraint or demand more remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: not every technological advance has to mean more cameras. Sometimes the smartest move is to take it away.
The latest 10 news from this category
An investor told the Anthropic chief executive to be a „more positive advocate” for his industry. The answer was sharper...
Eleven people in Paris claim the GPUs companies already own are running far below capacity. They set the deadline for...
Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft are building gas plants of several gigawatts each. Analysts reckon the price of gas will...
Pony.ai provides the technology, Uber provides the users, and a local partner gets the maintenance, cleaning and charging. Four European...
The ban on autonomous trucks over 4,500 kilograms fell in April, and Aurora and Kodiak got permits immediately. The lawsuit...
The company tried to delay answering until the Supreme Court ruled on something else. It failed - and only then...
The codebase is fifteen times larger than before, and users get a file with the labels attached to their profile....
Nobody told them they were not alone on the project. Each concluded the other was deliberately obstructing it - and...
Until now the private sector was allowed to defend but not to attack. One signature brought that wall down, and...
Same screen, same design, a new processor and an agent that phones a restaurant on the user's behalf. The price...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.