"Crime as a service" with call centres in Macedonia too: over 4 million euros in damage, victims in 50 countries
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
While everyone races to put a camera on your face, one startup bets on the opposite. Even Realities has unveiled its G2 smart glasses - no camera, no speakers, just a display that shows you text in front of your eyes. The company has just become a "unicorn" with an estimated value of one billion dollars after a 150-million investment led by China's Meituan and Tencent. The bet is clear: productivity instead of filming everyone around you.
Technically, the glasses weigh just 35 grams, have a monochrome display with greenish text visible in any light, four microphones and a battery that lasts up to two days. They cost 599 dollars (about 555 euros). They handle scheduling, reminders, live translation between languages, step-by-step navigation and come with a built-in voice assistant. In a word - a small computer on your nose, but one that films no one. And that's exactly the point.
The difference from Meta and its Ray-Ban glasses with a camera isn't accidental - it's the whole story. When you wear glasses with a camera, everyone around you becomes a potential recording without being asked. Even Realities deliberately dropped the camera and says: privacy is a feature, not an oversight. In a world where every device wants to watch and listen to you, glasses that promise not to record you sound almost rebellious. The question is whether the buyer wants a work tool or a toy for content.
For the European user, this is more interesting than it looks. While EU regulators wrestle with glasses that record everything, a device without a camera sidesteps most of the privacy debate up front. Whether the market will reward restraint or demand more remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: not every technological advance has to mean more cameras. Sometimes the smartest move is to take it away.
The latest 10 news from this category
Geoffrey Hinton isn't afraid of robots, he's afraid of the dark: power grids and banks down for days. And he...
The most popular AI companions have 220 million downloads, and many of them aim squarely at younger users. Apple now...
Half a metre of plastic, printed in orbit. Sounds modest, but the whole space industry keeps hitting one limit: everything...
Designed by the man who drew the iPhone, mocked at its premiere, sold out before the first delivery. When the...
Deeper in its IPO prospectus, in the risk section, Anthropic wrote that the development of the company's models may soon...
The Bundestag is counting potentially hacked phones, and Berlin won't say whether Merz was a target. The irony: German police...
The SpaceX-owned company also argued citizens have no right to sue over the air they breathe. The court disagreed, and...
The model of China's WeChat is now being built by an app in mostly American hands. Whoever decides where you...
Google is paying for AI that eats its search earnings, Amazon burned through 42 billion dollars more cash than it...
The researcher who found the hole had nowhere to report it, so he turned to journalists. The company now says...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.