"Crime as a service" with call centres in Macedonia too: over 4 million euros in damage, victims in 50 countries
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Norway is considering banning smart glasses and other wearable devices with a built-in camera. Not labelling them, not regulating them at the margins - banning them. These are devices of the kind made by Meta and Snap: with a camera, connected to the internet, and soon perhaps with facial recognition too.
Digital minister Karianne Tung, quoted by the French agency AFP, described what the government sees: "a clear trend towards combining artificial intelligence with cameras and microphones built into glasses, headphones, caps and other items we use every day." Then she said the sentence everything turns on: "We must prevent this equipment being used to track other people in public places."
The key word is other. The entire marketing of these devices is built around the buyer - your hands are free, your memories are recorded, your assistant sees what you see. Nobody asked the person across the table. They have no button, no notification and, unlike a phone raised towards a face, not even a sign that anything is being recorded. Which is why the nickname "creep glasses" has already stuck in public - a name no marketing department came up with, and which stayed anyway.
Tung also announced an expert group to advise the government, and a possible ban would cover facial recognition of other people in public places too. That is a second, harder threshold: a camera records, but facial recognition from a recording creates a searchable record of somebody who agreed to nothing.
Norway is not an EU member, but it is not outside its rules either - and on questions like this it is usually the first to draw a line rather than the last. The question that remains is not whether the technology will reach us too, but who here would be responsible for saying anything about it when it does.
The latest 10 news from this category
Geoffrey Hinton isn't afraid of robots, he's afraid of the dark: power grids and banks down for days. And he...
The most popular AI companions have 220 million downloads, and many of them aim squarely at younger users. Apple now...
Half a metre of plastic, printed in orbit. Sounds modest, but the whole space industry keeps hitting one limit: everything...
Designed by the man who drew the iPhone, mocked at its premiere, sold out before the first delivery. When the...
Deeper in its IPO prospectus, in the risk section, Anthropic wrote that the development of the company's models may soon...
The Bundestag is counting potentially hacked phones, and Berlin won't say whether Merz was a target. The irony: German police...
The SpaceX-owned company also argued citizens have no right to sue over the air they breathe. The court disagreed, and...
The model of China's WeChat is now being built by an app in mostly American hands. Whoever decides where you...
Google is paying for AI that eats its search earnings, Amazon burned through 42 billion dollars more cash than it...
The researcher who found the hole had nowhere to report it, so he turned to journalists. The company now says...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.