"Crime as a service" with call centres in Macedonia too: over 4 million euros in damage, victims in 50 countries
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Four hundred million dollars (around 345 million euros) is the price TikTok and its parent ByteDance paid to close the US Department of Justice lawsuit. The charge: for years they let children under 13 onto the platform and collected their personal data without parents knowing anything about it.
The settlement requires no admission of guilt. That is the key sentence in this whole story and it is worth reading twice. The company pays, changes a few settings, and legally speaking - nothing happened.
The lawsuit began in 2024, under the US law on protecting children's privacy online. According to the charge, TikTok knew there were children on the platform and kept them there for years. Worse: those children's data ended up in the targeted advertising system, while employees inside the company had already raised the alarm that something was wrong.
But this is not the first time. In 2019 the same company paid 5.7 million dollars for the same violation, then through its predecessor Musical.ly, and promised to prevent under-13s from opening accounts. Seven years later the bill is seventy times bigger. The question that asks itself: does the penalty function as a penalty at all, or is it just a cost written into the budget?
The charge goes a step further - it claims the company changed its registration rules in a way that made age verification harder. In other words, the system did not fail by accident.
The timing is almost comic. Only days before the settlement, a report emerged that TikTok deliberately switched off algorithmic protection for around 10 percent of US users - as an experiment. That protection existed to limit harmful content reaching the user. Two US senators, a Republican and a Democrat, sent a letter to CEO Shou Chew demanding an explanation. When Washington unites across party lines, it usually means the situation really is bad.
In Europe, regulation on protecting minors' data is stricter on paper than the American version. The question is how much of that reaches the screen of a child in Skopje, opening the same app with the same algorithm behind it.
The latest 10 news from this category
Geoffrey Hinton isn't afraid of robots, he's afraid of the dark: power grids and banks down for days. And he...
The most popular AI companions have 220 million downloads, and many of them aim squarely at younger users. Apple now...
Half a metre of plastic, printed in orbit. Sounds modest, but the whole space industry keeps hitting one limit: everything...
Designed by the man who drew the iPhone, mocked at its premiere, sold out before the first delivery. When the...
Deeper in its IPO prospectus, in the risk section, Anthropic wrote that the development of the company's models may soon...
The Bundestag is counting potentially hacked phones, and Berlin won't say whether Merz was a target. The irony: German police...
The SpaceX-owned company also argued citizens have no right to sue over the air they breathe. The court disagreed, and...
The model of China's WeChat is now being built by an app in mostly American hands. Whoever decides where you...
Google is paying for AI that eats its search earnings, Amazon burned through 42 billion dollars more cash than it...
The researcher who found the hole had nowhere to report it, so he turned to journalists. The company now says...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.