"Crime as a service" with call centres in Macedonia too: over 4 million euros in damage, victims in 50 countries
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
02.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
For the first time the US government will allow vetted private companies to carry out offensive cyber operations - spying, planting spyware and destroying other people's data and systems. The targets are international criminal groups and hackers. The decision was published in a presidential memorandum on Wednesday.
The US position until now, across several administrations, was simple: the private sector may defend but may not attack. American computer crime laws apply to companies exactly as they do to any citizen, and attacking without a court order is a criminal offence. With one signature, that wall came down.
A million dollar deposit as a guarantee of good behaviour
The mechanism is as interesting as the decision. A company wanting to take part must post a one million dollar deposit, forfeited if the government finds it is not following the rules. Every operation requires a sign-off from the Justice Department and from Homeland Security. Americans and systems inside the US must not be targets. If a firm discovers that an attack on American critical infrastructure is coming - the power grid, the water supply - it is obliged to notify the government.
The guidelines on who is allowed in will come out in the next two months. The memorandum explicitly says firms of all sizes will be considered, including small ones - they are supposedly better suited to specialised operations. Read that again: a small private firm, with a million dollar deposit, licensed to break into foreign systems.
Who answers when it goes wrong
Jake Williams, an industry veteran and vice president for research and development at the cybersecurity firm Hunter Strategy, called the policy „half-baked”. His main objection is not technical but far more down to earth: „Americans participating in these operations could easily be classified as unlawful combatants while travelling abroad.”
And he adds something sharper still - the accusation does not even have to be true. The policy itself creates cover for any foreign government to accuse any American security specialist who falls into its hands. Precisely what American prosecutors have done for years with Chinese, Iranian and Russian state hackers can now come back the other way - only this time the person in the firing line will be an employee of a private company.
The memorandum does not permit „hacking back” on one's own initiative. But critics have warned for years about the same thing: when a private firm carries out an attack under state supervision, the foreign government hit by it does not see a firm - it sees a state. And it responds accordingly.
The context that explains the hurry
The administration gave no reason, mentioning only a „growing threat”. The reason is visible without an official explanation. More than ten American states, among them Michigan, Minnesota and Georgia, are reporting breaches of local water systems, which intelligence services unofficially attribute to hackers backed by the Iranian government. So far there has been no need to issue a water safety warning.
All of this comes after months of war between the US and Israel on one side and Iran on the other, in which Iran's supreme leader was killed. The Iranian military responded with missiles against Western-owned data centres and with cyberattacks actively disrupting American companies and infrastructure. At the same time, American federal cybersecurity agencies went through a wave of layoffs.
So: a state that cut its own security apparatus and is now opening it up to the private market. In the Balkans we know that model under a different name - when an institution has no capacity, the work is put „out”, and responsibility disperses until nobody can find it any more. The only difference is that here the external contractor gets a licence to break into systems in other countries.
The latest 10 news from this category
Geoffrey Hinton isn't afraid of robots, he's afraid of the dark: power grids and banks down for days. And he...
The most popular AI companions have 220 million downloads, and many of them aim squarely at younger users. Apple now...
Half a metre of plastic, printed in orbit. Sounds modest, but the whole space industry keeps hitting one limit: everything...
Designed by the man who drew the iPhone, mocked at its premiere, sold out before the first delivery. When the...
Deeper in its IPO prospectus, in the risk section, Anthropic wrote that the development of the company's models may soon...
The Bundestag is counting potentially hacked phones, and Berlin won't say whether Merz was a target. The irony: German police...
The SpaceX-owned company also argued citizens have no right to sue over the air they breathe. The court disagreed, and...
The model of China's WeChat is now being built by an app in mostly American hands. Whoever decides where you...
Google is paying for AI that eats its search earnings, Amazon burned through 42 billion dollars more cash than it...
The researcher who found the hole had nowhere to report it, so he turned to journalists. The company now says...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.