Children With Disabilities Stuck in a Maze, 10.7 Million Paid Out With No Basis: The Audit of the Social Work Centres
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
16.06.2026
17.06.2026
16.06.2026
15.06.2026
17.06.2026
17.06.2026
16.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Iran has sent a peace proposal via Pakistan. Donald Trump rejected it. And added, with his usual delivery: „Are we going to go there and bomb them to hell, or are we going to make a deal?" That isn't a rhetorical question - it is a signal. When Trump talks loudly about a military solution, it means the White House is close to a choice.
Context: After two months of war and the ceasefire of 8 April, there had been one round of direct negotiations between Iran and the US. It failed. Now Tehran has offered a new proposal - mediated by Islamabad. Trump said Iran is asking for „things he cannot agree to". Those „things" - according to the Iranian source, come down to: lifting sanctions, opening Hormuz, and a guarantee of non-intervention.
In other words, Iran is asking for what any state asks for after a war - security, economic normality, the right to its own choice. Trump calls those three points „too much". That means the administration isn't after peace, but capitulation. And capitulation doesn't come to the table via Pakistan - it comes with another military operation.
A telling element in this tangled narrative is something Trump himself said: „Iran has made progress in the negotiations, but there are significant divisions in the leadership." That is diplomatic for: „I know that in Tehran there is a split between the pragmatists who want a deal and the hardliners who block it." If such a split really exists - and Trump exploits it through war - then this isn't a defeat for Iran, it is a calculated choice for an internal political victory at the price of a new war.
For the Balkans, which is now watching its third cycle of „deal or war" in the last three years (Ukraine 2022, Gaza 2023, Iran 2026), the strategy is the same: Trump proposes with a knife on the table, and when the other side won't agree, he strikes. And he always asks for a „deal" on terms the other side cannot accept - and then frames that as „a refusal of peace". The rhetoric is standard. The results - predictable. The bill - doesn't go to Brussels or Washington. It comes to us.
The latest 10 news from this category
A retired couple, a frigate and five shots - the two sides are telling completely different stories. When two worlds...
The figure comes from one side only, with no independent confirmation. And in war, the first casualty is always the...
A refinery 15 kilometers from the Kremlin that supplies 40 percent of Moscow's market was hit. The drone doesn't read...
A Tu-22M3 caught fire in the air over Irkutsk before slamming into the ground. When a machine like this crashes...
The commander of the German air force speaks of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad as targets. When a general publicly lists...
Revenge dressed up as missiles, a cathedral hit too. The Balkans know all too well what it means for a...
Europe's largest nuclear plant is once again a target. A cloud knows no borders, and the wind does not read...
Speculation about a new ceasefire deal reveals an uncomfortable truth - even a truce has its losers, and the Balkans...
A missile traveling over Mach 10 with 36 elements striking at once - Kyiv has nothing to intercept it, and...
Two senior military figures, the same hall, opposite assessments. If the highest minds can't agree whether war is coming, what...