Six men stormed a house near Strumica and beat a family with children: the father fired into the air so someone would come
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
27.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
27.07.2026
26.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
28.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
27.07.2026
26.07.2026
25.07.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
„Not to weep, not to rage, but to understand.” The line is nearly four centuries old. Baruch Spinoza wrote it in his Theological-Political Treatise of 1670, and psychologists today copy it out as though it were a new conflict resolution technique.
Spinoza was born in the Netherlands to a Sephardic family and died at 44. He published only two books in his lifetime. He was influenced by the Stoics, but on one point he went further than they did: the Stoics taught how to endure pain, while Spinoza wanted to find its actual causes - physical and psychological. The difference matters. One is enduring, the other is understanding.
Pilar Conde, a psychologist and technical director of the Origen clinics, says the line does not ask anyone to abolish their emotions. Anger, tears and fear arrive on their own, and that is normal. What Spinoza is pointing at is something else - the ability to look at the context, understand the other person's motives, and not focus solely on your own reaction.
The practical part is absurdly simple. When someone insults you or says something that stings, instead of firing back, ask: „What do you mean?” That is it. One question that gives you information before you react, instead of reacting to what you assumed was said.
Conde lists a few more rules. Avoid impulsive reactions - give yourself time to assess the situation. Actually listen to the other person. State your view with „I think” and „in my opinion”, without erasing the person you are talking to. Give up the need to always be right. And accept that some conflicts do not end in agreement, but in mutual respect for differing views.
That last one is the hardest. Around here an argument is rarely aimed at understanding - it is aimed at winning. Who gets the last word, who is louder, who forces the other to shut up. And raising your voice, as psychologists point out, actually weakens your argument: the other person stops listening and starts defending.
Spinoza had neither Twitter nor a family group chat. He still wrote the manual for both.
The latest 10 news from this category
Everyone assumes cannelloni means oven and béchamel. It does not. Four cold versions, not a single degree of oven heat,...
The brain holds on to one criticism longer than to ten compliments. That is not weak willpower - it is...
48 hours in the freezer is not a tip for better flavour. Anyone who tells you vinegar is enough is...
What looks like aesthetics has strength, balance and control behind it. A ballerina explains what actually changes in the body,...
The rough morning is usually not the drink's fault but the fault of a choice made in a shop for...
Yogurt, homemade granola and a little nuts. A nutritionist explains why fullness is a better indicator than the „healthy” label...
A dish everyone knows and no one makes the way it should be. An award-winning chef reveals why most versions...
You're always last on your own list, and that “everything else” never ends. An empty vessel fills nothing - not...
Fresh sardines, wild fennel, raisins and saffron. Some dishes are born of abundance, the best from scarcity.
After a sleepless night the hand reaches for chocolate on its own, and then comes the guilt. Science says the...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.