A New Criminal Complaint Against Jakimovski: A Building Permit Based on a Plan Struck Down Back in 2018
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
15.09.2026
16.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
16.09.2026
15.09.2026
15.09.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
16.09.2026
15.09.2026
14.09.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The French parliament will read tomorrow in its first reading a law that would criminalize comparing Israel to the Nazi regime. A panel of five UN experts warned the law could threaten freedom of expression and other fundamental rights.
The draft law, submitted by parliamentarian Caroline Yadan in November 2024, envisions criminal penalties not just for denying a state's existence, but also for "excessively trivializing" terrorist acts or those responsible for them. It would also become a criminal offense to publicly call for the destruction of a state recognized by France.
UN: This is a dangerous expansion
The five experts warn the law "dangerously expands the already vague and overly broad concept of 'glorification of terrorism' in French law." Its unjustified restriction of free expression "would stifle legitimate public debate and advocacy of human rights, including those concerning Palestine and Israel."
"Criminal law should not suppress differing views on current or past events, regardless of how inaccurate, unpopular, or shocking they may be, unless such expression aims to incite violence," the statement reads.
The sharpest part? "By distorting the meaning of antisemitism and linking it with a broad spectrum of legitimate political expression, this law risks trivializing actual cases of antisemitic hatred." In other words - the law meant to protect against hatred could make it invisible. Criticism of Israel and Zionism, the experts stress, does not constitute antisemitism.
The law enjoys broad support in the French parliament, including from the far right. When both the far left and far right agree on something, it usually deserves closer scrutiny.
The latest 10 news from this category
Sanctions imposed over one war are being offered as currency in an entirely different dispute. Most member states are against...
El Nino in the Pacific shifts the currents that decide where snow falls. An area that usually gets a metre...
The easiest way to dismiss an uncomfortable argument is to point at who is making it. But that does not...
The appeals court ruled the entire trial must start over. The son of Norway's queen is waiting for it on...
Trump scaled back the military exercises to ease the tension, and Wonsan answered in the form of projectiles. What does...
The sanctions list got a seven-day extension instead of one measured in months, a move diplomats themselves call unprecedented. Two...
Switzerland offered a table for talks on Ukraine, Moscow replied that the table stopped being neutral once Bern adopted EU...
The will says one thing, a committee of twenty-one men decided another. The queen mother says the army pulled the...
A country that was Europe's byword for stability for decades now has a parliament split into two blocs by a...
Sixteen years in power, defeat at a regular election, five months of quiet - and now the election result is...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.