At two in the morning, when the neighbourhood is asleep, two people pull up on electric scooters outside the shopping complex in Shuto Orizari. They are in no hurry. They douse the shopfronts in flammable liquid, set them alight, and leave the same way they came. The whole operation takes less than a minute. The result: more than 20 shops burned out.

The footage, posted on social media, changes the entire case. What yesterday was a "fire at a shopping centre" - a phrase that lets anyone imagine faulty wiring, a cigarette, an accident - is today something else entirely. Someone came, someone lit it, someone fled. That is not an accident, that is an act.

According to the Crisis Management Centre, 15 firefighters with six engines fought the blaze from 3:31 to 6:45 in the morning. Three hours and fourteen minutes to put out what took fifty seconds to start. Every burned shop belonged to one owner and was leased out - so what burned was somebody else's labour, somebody else's stock, somebody else's rent money already paid.

Who pays, and who answers

The Interior Ministry has so far given no official word on the cause. There is an inspection, there are "measures taken to clear up the case" - a phrase everyone in this country knows by heart. The question that remains is more specific: there is security camera footage, there is a time, there is a date, there are two people on scooters. How long does it take to close a circle like that?

Because this is not abstract. Those shops held textiles and other goods. Behind each one stands a person who opened it in the morning, arranged the stock and assumed they would be there the next day. Some twenty families lost their income in a single night - and nobody has yet said the word "motive" out loud.

The footage was published by a local outlet on social media, not by an institution. And that is the story's own punchline: the evidence that changed how the case is understood came from Facebook, not from a press release. When the camera works better than the official statement, that is not a triumph of technology - it is a measure of how fast the institution moves.