Cocaine under a teddy bear in Skopje's Brest: „a larger quantity” is all we were told
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
26.07.2026
25.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
26.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
27.07.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
27.07.2026
26.07.2026
25.07.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The governing VLEN issued a statement accusing DUI of blocking the Law on Equitable Representation and thereby working directly against one of the founding principles of the Ohrid Framework Agreement. That is a specific accusation about a specific law - and the least interesting part of the entire statement.
The rest is classic party artillery. According to VLEN, DUI's leadership hates the majority of Albanians who sent them into opposition, their destructiveness is reaching worrying proportions, and after 22 years of governing in SDSM and VMRO-DPMNE cabinets they have become the worst possible representative of the Albanian vote. VLEN also claims that a small group around Ali Ahmeti is politically offering to help VMRO win more than 60 MPs at the next parliamentary elections, in order to escape criminal liability.
Both sides have been, or are, in power
Here is the frame worth holding onto. The two parties now arguing over who represents Albanians better both have long government terms behind them - DUI for decades, VLEN right now. Which means the Law on Equitable Representation, if it is that fundamental, has passed through the hands of both.
VLEN claims that trying to create the impression that Albanians' rights are threatened simply because DUI is not a coalition partner amounts to knowingly serving the political interests of the Macedonian right. That is a heavy formulation - a party sitting in government with VMRO-DPMNE accusing another party of working for VMRO-DPMNE.
What is left of the law?
The whole statement contains exactly one verifiable thing: whether the Law on Equitable Representation is in parliament, what stage it is at, and who voted how. That is information any citizen can look up - and it is precisely the part for which the statement offers not a single date.
Press statements are free and take a day to write. A law in parliament comes with a recorded vote, names included. Next time either side claims who is blocking what, it will be far more convincing if they produce the record.
The latest 10 news from this category
63 years after the earthquake, the SDSM leader says the city is being destroyed again - this time by bad...
The former and current foreign ministers are trading posts about the negotiating framework. Instead of a legal opinion, the argument...
The same sentence, two opposite reactions. When an opposition minister claimed it - it was treason. When a governing minister...
A public advert instead of party appointment - on paper it is hard to argue against. But an advert is...
67 votes for Zulfikar Zejnula. The Turks' party crosses from DUI to the ruling side, and VMRO's majority grows to...
Something is moving, but no one dares say what. The red lines on history and identity hold - while the...
If the flag was never a problem, why did it take 24 years and one foreign ambassador?
When the state decides how universities will grade themselves, the line with autonomy gets thin.
When neighbors and countries at war overtake us, the question of who's to blame is no longer rhetorical. The only...
Russian Ambassador Zikov: the move is not friendly, Macedonia has taken on serious anti-Russian obligations. As Bulgaria walks out, we...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more