UGD's E-Transcripts Were "Fixed" for Money for Five Years: Two Employees Held in Custody
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The governing VLEN issued a statement accusing DUI of blocking the Law on Equitable Representation and thereby working directly against one of the founding principles of the Ohrid Framework Agreement. That is a specific accusation about a specific law - and the least interesting part of the entire statement.
The rest is classic party artillery. According to VLEN, DUI's leadership hates the majority of Albanians who sent them into opposition, their destructiveness is reaching worrying proportions, and after 22 years of governing in SDSM and VMRO-DPMNE cabinets they have become the worst possible representative of the Albanian vote. VLEN also claims that a small group around Ali Ahmeti is politically offering to help VMRO win more than 60 MPs at the next parliamentary elections, in order to escape criminal liability.
Both sides have been, or are, in power
Here is the frame worth holding onto. The two parties now arguing over who represents Albanians better both have long government terms behind them - DUI for decades, VLEN right now. Which means the Law on Equitable Representation, if it is that fundamental, has passed through the hands of both.
VLEN claims that trying to create the impression that Albanians' rights are threatened simply because DUI is not a coalition partner amounts to knowingly serving the political interests of the Macedonian right. That is a heavy formulation - a party sitting in government with VMRO-DPMNE accusing another party of working for VMRO-DPMNE.
What is left of the law?
The whole statement contains exactly one verifiable thing: whether the Law on Equitable Representation is in parliament, what stage it is at, and who voted how. That is information any citizen can look up - and it is precisely the part for which the statement offers not a single date.
Press statements are free and take a day to write. A law in parliament comes with a recorded vote, names included. Next time either side claims who is blocking what, it will be far more convincing if they produce the record.
The latest 10 news from this category
Corruption is widespread, electoral reforms are stalled, and on the Constitution "no attempts were made". Amid all that, Brussels found...
The opposition accuses the local self-government minister of glorifying a convicted war criminal, ties to Serbian intelligence structures and threats...
DUI took Brvenica, and for VMRO-DPMNE the result is "more than excellent" - even though its coalition partner VLEN ended...
The rules are good, the services don't cooperate, so let's delete the rules. The opposition asks why the Coordination Council...
The opposition announces an interpellation and demands an investigation, the governor answers with "Is that clear now?" How long the...
Mickoski counts a gain of 1,200 votes since the first round, but he doesn't have Brvenica. "Alone against everyone" sounds...
The opposition claims it warned for months, the prime minister leaned on the National Bank's checks. Somebody vetted the bank...
On 1 November Sofia elects its head of state. The debate was a squabble over who deserves the credit for...
At his closing rally he talked about unity and institutions that serve the citizen. Then, from the stage, he pointed...
On television, a bishop wished one party the longevity of a president for life and accused journalists of financial interest....
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.