Нови клупи и обновени летниковци во паркот „Македонија“: ќе преживеат ли една зима без да бидат уништени
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
12.06.2026
13.06.2026
12.06.2026
11.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
13.06.2026
12.06.2026
12.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
09.06.2026
22.05.2026
19.05.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
A company that sells cybersecurity to the US government while hiding its own breaches at the same time. That, in short, is the accusation a former senior IBM executive is putting on the table - and not on a forum, but as a formal whistleblower complaint.
William Barlow, until 2019 the vice president for threat detection at IBM, claims the company covered up multiple breaches by Chinese hackers and failed to report them to the authorities. The most serious case concerns IBM's own network: between 2013 and 2016, a group linked to the Chinese government, known as APT 10, allegedly entered the systems over 56,000 times. The internal investigation, according to the complaint, found nearly 400 compromised accounts and around 200 systems across 18 countries.
Barlow lists two more cases - the cybersecurity startup Trusteer and the healthcare company Truven, both bought by IBM, both allegedly breached with a superficial investigation and no real reporting. What's especially awkward: intelligence agencies from the five "Five Eyes" countries (the US, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) warned IBM about the intrusion as far back as March 2017.
IBM hits back short and cold: "This complaint was filed six years ago, and the US Department of Justice declined to get involved. IBM is confident that our actions were in accordance with the law." Translation: you proved nothing then, you won't prove anything now.
Barlow's lawyer puts a finger where it hurts most: "You can't sell cybersecurity to the federal government while you allegedly have those same security problems in your own company." Whether the court will agree is one question. The other, harder one, is how many other big names do the same - staying silent about their own holes while charging others to plug them.
The latest 10 news from this category
6.500 инженери префрлени без избор да хранат ВИ модел опишуваат соул-крашинг работа, а Закерберг тврди дека се попаметни од хонорарците...
Софтвер за фишинг што секој може да го користи однесе речиси два милијарди долари и податоци од милиони картички -...
Компанијата што најгласно зборува за опасностите на вештачката интелигенција доби итно гасење на Mythos 5 и Fable 5 - а...
75,000 artificial tracks a day, and 85 percent of their plays are bots. When a machine steals from a machine,...
Prometheus is worth 41 billion dollars with no finished product. The biggest banks are investing in a promise, and Bezos...
Minors get special profiles with no like counts. The company says protection, but the concern came only after lawyers and...
Devin Kim claims he was fired days before he was to present his safety findings. The lawsuit landed right before...
A spot in the storefront is no longer forever - Apple will delete apps that don't attract users. Who decides...
The first Western carmaker with sodium-ion cells - and a deal where old vehicle batteries power data centers. The AI...
All the giants suddenly discovered India - Microsoft, Amazon, Google, OpenAI. Coincidence? New Delhi is offering a quarter-century tax-free, and...