Five Fire Fronts in One Night Near Raec: The Mayor Sounds the Alarm on Facebook, Prevention Is Once Again a Topic for September
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
02.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
01.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The Pentagon has added four major Chinese tech names - Alibaba, Baidu, electric-vehicle maker BYD and the robotics company Unitree - to a list of firms it claims support the Chinese military. A move that on paper is an administrative procedure, but in practice is one more front in the cold tech war between Washington and Beijing.
The list is no harmless thing. It's called 1260H, after the section of the 2021 US defence law that created it, and means American companies can be made to face hurdles in any business with the listed firms. With the new names, it now holds 188 companies - almost the entire top league of Chinese artificial intelligence, after Tencent was added last year.
The Chinese firms aren't staying quiet. Baidu responded sharply: "We categorically reject Baidu's inclusion on the list, there is no credible basis for it whatsoever. We will not hesitate to use every available option to remove the company from it." Alibaba said it is "not a Chinese military company" and announced legal steps. A standard reaction - but also a sign that the label hurts where it matters most: in the market.
This year the Pentagon has hit the car industry especially hard. Besides BYD, the list also picked up electric-vehicle maker Nio, the battery plants CALB and EVE Energy, and RoboSense - one of the leading Chinese makers of lidar sensors for autonomous driving. Baidu, in turn, is among the leaders in Chinese self-driving cars. The point is clear: the technology that powers tomorrow's cars is a strategic field today.
The timing is interesting too. The same update to the list was briefly published in February, then pulled from the official register without explanation, only to come out for good now. When a government publishes the same document twice, it's rarely an administrative slip - more often a matter of political timing. The Balkan reader recognises this well: lists are rarely just lists.
The latest 10 news from this category
The operator covering 67 million consumers admitted it does not have power for everyone and decided in advance who gets...
Sales are not falling because people got poorer, but because old phones stopped breaking on schedule. The industry's answer is...
Opus 5 set a record in the test and broke 11 agreements. Not one of the tricks is new -...
The billions were announced with a stage and slogans. The retreat is happening quietly, in sentences containing the word alignment.
In his last quarterly report Tim Cook announced the stronger Siri will be bought through iCloud+. The firm that paid...
The platforms that spent years convincing us automated content was the future are now patiently building filters against it. The...
Out of 141,006 test runs, three ended up inside the live systems of real firms. The oldest model worked out...
The strongest June quarter in its history, and the stock fell 6 percent. Artificial intelligence turned out to have a...
The FCC is closing the door to humanoid robots and power inverters, but only new ones. The millions of Chinese...
The player that raised the MP3 generation is betting nostalgia can be billed monthly. The new Winamp arrives in 2027,...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.