The Vodno Tower Was Finished in January, Opens Only in June: When Delay Becomes the Norm, We Stop Counting It
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
03.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
02.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
04.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
It sounds like a philosophical riddle, but it's one of the biggest technical problems in physics: how do you prove something is truly random? A die can have imperfections, a computer generator follows an algorithm, even a coin flip depends on forces that could in theory be calculated. Now physicists at Switzerland's ETH Zurich say they've solved it - with the help of one of nature's strangest phenomena.
"The resulting string of zeros and ones is now genuinely perfectly random, and we can also verify that," says physicist Renato Renner. The key challenge was never to create numbers that look random - it was to prove that no one could have predicted the outcome. And that difference, as it turned out, is worth far more than academic pride.
Why does it matter to the ordinary user? Because randomness is the foundation of modern security. Passwords, authentication codes and encryption keys are hard to guess precisely because they're random. When that fails, the consequences are real: the 2024 vulnerability in the SSH client PuTTY, or the 2025 flaw in AMD Zen 5 processors, where the hardware produced predictable "random" values - while falsely reporting success.
The team's solution lies in quantum entanglement. They created a pair of entangled quantum bits, separated them by 30 metres and cooled them almost to absolute zero. Measurements of those particles showed correlations so strong they can't be explained by any hidden rules or pre-programmed behaviour. In nine hours they ran over a billion such tests.
The most interesting part is what they call "randomness amplification" - they deliberately started with imperfect randomness and turned it into something provably perfectly unpredictable. And the system doesn't depend on trusting the hardware, but on the quantum behaviour itself. In a world that increasingly tells us "trust the tool," the idea that unpredictability can be mathematically proven rather than merely promised is refreshingly rare - and far more valuable than it sounds at first glance.
The latest 10 news from this category
A single infected employee laptop was enough. Ultrahuman admits the breach but refuses to say what „health data" means -...
The offering was oversubscribed, Buffett bought 10 billion, and Google will spend up to 190 billion on data centres this...
An industry that promised driverless rides is now building whole teams of people to return forgotten things. Technology removes the...
Six new add-ons for analysts, salespeople and bankers. Translated from corporate-speak: the tool is ready, it's left to employers to...
After Google shoved the links behind AI summaries, traffic to the no-AI version tripled. When something is forced on you,...
The fintech half the Balkans has on their phone is building a global network user by user - while local...
A week after a 65-billion round, the company behind Claude filed for an IPO. All the AI giants are running...
Artisan put the famous dog in the middle of the flames to sell an AI agent. The irony of an...
The term describes executives so swept up in artificial intelligence that they've lost touch with how it works. A pattern...
KPop Demon Hunters and a popular YouTuber's film won the weekend. The audience stopped asking long ago whether you come...