КОЈ ЈА ПУШТИ АЛТА БАНКА ВО МАКЕДОНИЈА, КОЈ ТРЕБАШЕ ДА ЈА КОНТРОЛИРА И КОЈ ЌЕ ОДГОВАРА ЗА ПРОЦЕНКАТА НА РИЗИКОТ?
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
05.11.2026
04.11.2026
03.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Grokipedia was announced as a more accurate alternative to Wikipedia. Today it is something else - a digital object that runs, gets visited, and isn't maintained. According to research by Lawfare, not a single article has been edited since 24 April this year.
The analysis covered over 34,000 pages with 225,496 proposed edits. The result: "not a single accepted or rejected correction in the last three months". This isn't a platform refusing fixes - it's a platform where nobody is looking to see whether any arrived. The recent changes section now shows no available updates, and the decision log for user submissions has stopped working.
Six million texts, zero readers on the other side
The project launched in October 2025 with around 885,000 articles. By November the second version had grown past six million texts. The number impresses right up until you ask who wrote them and who checked them. Wikipedia is slow precisely because it has people arguing over every sentence. That "slow" is its single quality.
The research turned up something worse than neglect. Grokipedia frequently drew on sources Wikipedia's editors consider unreliable - among them the neo-Nazi Stormfront and Infowars. So the platform built to correct an alleged bias leaned on the sources everyone else runs away from.
Millions of visits to an empty building
Despite the standstill, Grokipedia still pulls in millions of visitors a month. That's the part least commented on and most consequential: the content stays online, keeps being read, keeps being cited - and nobody stands behind it any more. A frozen encyclopedia isn't neutral. It's a snapshot of one day, stuck in place as if it were permanent truth.
The company did not respond to media questions about the project's status. Elon Musk last mentioned it publicly in February 2026. Since then - silence, while the pages keep opening.
The question isn't whether Musk will come back to the project. The question is how many people are today reading something that looks like an encyclopedia and is actually an abandoned warehouse.
The latest 10 news from this category
A company founded in 2024, with a product launched last summer and agents borrowed from Anthropic and OpenAI - now...
A web host with about 400,000 paying customers admits to an attack that lasted since August. How many were affected?...
Geoffrey Hinton isn't afraid of robots, he's afraid of the dark: power grids and banks down for days. And he...
The most popular AI companions have 220 million downloads, and many of them aim squarely at younger users. Apple now...
Half a metre of plastic, printed in orbit. Sounds modest, but the whole space industry keeps hitting one limit: everything...
Designed by the man who drew the iPhone, mocked at its premiere, sold out before the first delivery. When the...
Deeper in its IPO prospectus, in the risk section, Anthropic wrote that the development of the company's models may soon...
The Bundestag is counting potentially hacked phones, and Berlin won't say whether Merz was a target. The irony: German police...
The SpaceX-owned company also argued citizens have no right to sue over the air they breathe. The court disagreed, and...
The model of China's WeChat is now being built by an app in mostly American hands. Whoever decides where you...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.