A cocked pistol on the road near Krushopek: the line between a police bulletin and a funeral was held by somebody else's nerve
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
06.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
05.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
05.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Grokipedia was announced as a more accurate alternative to Wikipedia. Today it is something else - a digital object that runs, gets visited, and isn't maintained. According to research by Lawfare, not a single article has been edited since 24 April this year.
The analysis covered over 34,000 pages with 225,496 proposed edits. The result: "not a single accepted or rejected correction in the last three months". This isn't a platform refusing fixes - it's a platform where nobody is looking to see whether any arrived. The recent changes section now shows no available updates, and the decision log for user submissions has stopped working.
Six million texts, zero readers on the other side
The project launched in October 2025 with around 885,000 articles. By November the second version had grown past six million texts. The number impresses right up until you ask who wrote them and who checked them. Wikipedia is slow precisely because it has people arguing over every sentence. That "slow" is its single quality.
The research turned up something worse than neglect. Grokipedia frequently drew on sources Wikipedia's editors consider unreliable - among them the neo-Nazi Stormfront and Infowars. So the platform built to correct an alleged bias leaned on the sources everyone else runs away from.
Millions of visits to an empty building
Despite the standstill, Grokipedia still pulls in millions of visitors a month. That's the part least commented on and most consequential: the content stays online, keeps being read, keeps being cited - and nobody stands behind it any more. A frozen encyclopedia isn't neutral. It's a snapshot of one day, stuck in place as if it were permanent truth.
The company did not respond to media questions about the project's status. Elon Musk last mentioned it publicly in February 2026. Since then - silence, while the pages keep opening.
The question isn't whether Musk will come back to the project. The question is how many people are today reading something that looks like an encyclopedia and is actually an abandoned warehouse.
The latest 10 news from this category
Nine million square metres of production space for chips to power robots and orbital data centres. The day before the...
The two biggest dating apps suddenly discover that meeting in person was the point. Bumble's revenue fell 15.2 percent, which...
Jeff Dean, Google's thirtieth employee, is walking out after 27 years and taking three of the company's best researchers with...
Private Relay hides your IP address and is paid for through iCloud+. Two researchers showed it can be bypassed, but...
The rocket company made 7.8 billion in a single quarter, and almost 2 billion of it came from data centres...
Alex Karp argues that companies building language models pipe your expertise into their model to take your business. In the...
Norwegian researchers found code in smart TV apps that turns your home connection into a tunnel for someone else's traffic....
The operator covering 67 million consumers admitted it does not have power for everyone and decided in advance who gets...
Sales are not falling because people got poorer, but because old phones stopped breaking on schedule. The industry's answer is...
Opus 5 set a record in the test and broke 11 agreements. Not one of the tricks is new -...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.