„We Have Valid Permits and Can't Even Get Home”: Centar Residents Furious Over New Parking Tariffs
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The lower house of the US Congress passed a resolution demanding the withdrawal of American armed forces from hostilities against Iran - and it did so with the votes of part of the Republicans who turned their backs on their own president. The result: 215 for, 208 against, with four Republicans on the Democrats' side.
The resolution, proposed by the Democrats, explicitly orders: Congress directs the president to withdraw the forces from military action against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Trump launched the American involvement on 28 February 2026 - now, a few months later, his own parliament sends him a message.
The gesture is mainly symbolic. Trump has the right of veto, and overriding the veto requires a two-thirds majority in both houses - something currently considered almost impossible. A similar measure in late May passed a procedural vote in the Senate, after seven previous failed attempts.
The Democrats described the vote as „a strong and unambiguous message to Donald Trump from the American people" and said it is time to end „this unlawful and deeply unpopular war". Constitutionally, only Congress has the power to declare war - an argument the White House sidesteps by claiming the conflict is over because of the existing truce.
But the Democrats fire back: American forces are still engaged in enforcing blockades of Iranian ports. So, war de facto, peace on paper.
For the Balkan reader, the scenario is painfully familiar - an executive waging war without genuine parliamentary approval, and a legislative house that votes bravely exactly when it knows the vote carries no consequences. How many times have we seen institutions that „react" only when the reaction changes nothing? Democracy looks different when the symbol is all that is left.
The latest 10 news from this category
600 sailors with no beds, 30 hours of fighting the fire by hand. If the most expensive warship of the...
When allies insult each other over the phone, the question isn't whether the ceasefire is fragile - it's how long...
The crown princess has used oxygen for years. Haakon is cancelling everything - Japan, Stockholm, a silver anniversary - over...
Strawberry-farm workers promised a wage they never saw. 14 arson attacks in a few months. The Europe that lives off...
Groups with headlamps and fishing waders go underground and come back hours later. Even in the world's biggest city, the...
When a system begins to allow questions it once banned, that's rarely a sign of openness - more often it's...
A number without context is a weapon, not information. The Chinese jets beat the European ones only because the match...
The difference between "the US returned to the forum" and "America knelt" is the difference between journalism and propaganda. When...
After the drone strikes during the conflict with Iran, the emirate is chasing tourists with discounts. For someone from Beirut,...
With threats and sanctions, Washington achieved what years of warnings couldn't. Brussels is preparing a tech-sovereignty package. And what do...