Шест години лажни категории во возачки дозволи од шалтер во МВР: обвинети шестмина, уште 21 лице под истрага
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
20.09.2026
20.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
20.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
21.09.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
20.09.2026
19.09.2026
18.09.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The lower house of the US Congress passed a resolution demanding the withdrawal of American armed forces from hostilities against Iran - and it did so with the votes of part of the Republicans who turned their backs on their own president. The result: 215 for, 208 against, with four Republicans on the Democrats' side.
The resolution, proposed by the Democrats, explicitly orders: Congress directs the president to withdraw the forces from military action against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Trump launched the American involvement on 28 February 2026 - now, a few months later, his own parliament sends him a message.
The gesture is mainly symbolic. Trump has the right of veto, and overriding the veto requires a two-thirds majority in both houses - something currently considered almost impossible. A similar measure in late May passed a procedural vote in the Senate, after seven previous failed attempts.
The Democrats described the vote as „a strong and unambiguous message to Donald Trump from the American people" and said it is time to end „this unlawful and deeply unpopular war". Constitutionally, only Congress has the power to declare war - an argument the White House sidesteps by claiming the conflict is over because of the existing truce.
But the Democrats fire back: American forces are still engaged in enforcing blockades of Iranian ports. So, war de facto, peace on paper.
For the Balkan reader, the scenario is painfully familiar - an executive waging war without genuine parliamentary approval, and a legislative house that votes bravely exactly when it knows the vote carries no consequences. How many times have we seen institutions that „react" only when the reaction changes nothing? Democracy looks different when the symbol is all that is left.
The latest 10 news from this category
Три опции на масата во Вашингтон - воен притисок, економско давење или договор - а претседателот ја опишува дилемата како...
Партијата на Аденауер и Кол се лизна до изборниот праг во Мекленбург, АфД веќе бара оставка од канцеларот, а Мерц...
Two prime ministers in the same Union, the same month, completely opposite diagnoses of who is provoking whom. There is...
A broken aircraft in a field usually ends up in a police note. This one ended up with federal investigators,...
Beijing will easily find another supplier. The harder question is what Washington is actually testing: whether private Chinese companies will...
The law lets Washington hit the five biggest buyers of Russian oil with tariffs of up to 100 per cent....
Measures imposed over the war in Ukraine are now being offered as currency in an entirely different dispute. If the...
A smaller dose and more needles does not mean a safer vaccine, it means an ineffective one. Science has had...
Harald designed the sarcophagus himself, and it is shaped like a ship. The stone is 400 million years old and...
Von der Leyen proposed a status that does not exist in European law, the Canadians distanced themselves, and Washington announced...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.