Nine-Year-Old on an E-Scooter Run Over Near Saraj: Who Let Scooters Onto a Regional Road?
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
29.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
29.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
29.07.2026
28.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
30.07.2026
29.07.2026
29.07.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
29.07.2026
28.07.2026
27.07.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
On 29 July 1981, 750 million people in 74 countries watched Diana Spencer walk into the cathedral in a dress that would become the most copied wedding gown of the twentieth century. Forty-five years later, a fashion historian says the design actually pointed to another queen - the one who ended under the guillotine.
Historian Amber Butchart, on a BBC programme devoted to the history of clothing, draws the line between Diana's gown and the portraits of Marie Antoinette painted by Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun. The enormous gathered sleeves, the ruffled neckline - that is the silhouette of the chemise à la reine, the dress with which the French queen caused a scandal in a Paris salon in 1783.
The numbers on the dress itself are almost absurd: 25 metres of silk and taffeta, 90 metres of tulle and 10,000 pearls and mother-of-pearl sequins. Designers David and Elizabeth Emanuel described it as „appropriately dramatic”. For an event watched by three quarters of a billion people, drama wasn't a stylistic choice but a technical requirement.
This is where the word the media use for this story comes in - premonition. Marie Antoinette was executed in October 1793. Diana died in a car crash in August 1997. Both women entered the institution from outside, both were shaped into a symbol, and both ended up as the subject of people who never knew them.
But calling that a premonition is a lovely sentence that doesn't hold water. Nobody in 1981 was designing an ending; they were designing splendour. What actually repeats is not fate but a pattern: an institution takes a young woman, turns her into the image it needs, and then doesn't know what to do when the image starts living on its own.
That is exactly what makes the dress interesting even now. Not as a fairy-tale relic, but as the first document of the production - the moment one person became material to be processed for decades. Thirty metres of fabric, ten thousand pearls, and seven hundred and fifty million pairs of eyes watching.
The wedding was the beginning. The question rarely asked is whether anyone ever asked her what she wanted to wear.
The latest 10 news from this category
The idea is free, the execution isn't. The good news: here the idea really is enough.
A dermatologist explains why SPF 50 doesn't buy more time than SPF 30 between two applications.
Fewer decisions in the morning means more energy for later. What an entire generation was taught to treat as shame,...
Heat creates free radicals even in the shade, and the cream you put on at eight in the morning is...
Meghan chose a bare back and not a single embellishment. Madeleine wore her mother's vintage dress. The second choice is...
Canvas on top, esparto underneath and one summer of life. There is a way to make the sole survive a...
If a little helps, more will help more - logic that works everywhere except in the bathroom. Plus one free...
An object that passes from grandmother to mother to daughter - and ends up in a bag with makeup and...
The fashion industry lives off the belief that every season demands a new personality. The women we hold up as...
The advice „put a little on the apples of your cheeks” works for exactly one face shape, and everyone else...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.