They Rode In on Scooters, Torched the Shops and Left: The Fire in Shuto Orizari Burned for Three Hours, Setting It Took Fifty Seconds
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
12.09.2026
11.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
12.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
12.09.2026
11.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
13.09.2026
12.09.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
13.09.2026
12.09.2026
11.09.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The war against Iran suddenly got a European address. Iran has officially accused NATO of complicity in what it describes as an illegal American-Israeli operation against its territory - and the trigger for the accusation is a statement by the alliance's own Secretary General, Mark Rutte.
In an interview on American television, Rutte revealed that 500 American aircraft took off from US bases in Italy in support of the operation named „Epic Fury", launched on February 28. According to him, the operation involved between 4,000 and 5,000 combat sorties from European bases, and alongside Italy, he named Romania as a participant too - Bucharest, he said, even cut commercial flights to make room for aerial refueling of the aircraft.
Iranian spokesman Esmail Baghaei immediately seized on the admission. „NATO's Secretary General explicitly identified Italy and Romania as participants in the aggression against Iran", he wrote, calling it an „admission of active complicity in an illegal war of aggression". Baghaei demanded that the two European countries explain to their own citizens and to the world why they're involved.
Italy quickly disowned the heavy words, claiming it had allowed only „technical and logistical flights", not operations of hundreds of combat aircraft. A classic diplomatic maneuver - being inside, while also not being quite all the way inside.
For the Balkans, this isn't abstract news. When an alliance that includes our own neighbors openly admits it's putting its bases at the disposal of a war against a third country, the question becomes concrete: where does „logistical support" end, and where does participation in war begin? And who asks the citizens of those countries whether they agree to their territory being a launch pad for someone else's conflict?
The latest 10 news from this category
A barren volcanic rock in the middle of a strait 28 kilometres wide changed the oil market in a single...
Hostomel, Odesa, Kryvyi Rih - targets that are not the front line but the supply chain. A war against the...
We don't want war with Europe, but here is exactly how that war would start. He said both sentences in...
When an army recalls its special forces with a 12-hour deadline, that is not a rota but a signal. The...
Port infrastructure in Makhachkala and the theatre building caught fire, the governor said. Moscow claims it shot down 448 drones...
Tehran says it hit around ten ships, Washington says it destroyed five Iranian tankers and that its own vessel is...
Residential buildings, a kindergarten and an Orthodox church damaged in Russia's largest Black Sea port. Four dead and 29 injured...
When there are no air-to-air missiles left, what remains is a 20mm cannon - and that means the pilot has...
In public - constructive talks. In private, according to an MP in the Verkhovna Rada, the envoys arrived with tougher...
Witkoff and Kushner spent three hours in the Kremlin and came out with an agreement in principle. November was not...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.