Filipče Demands Slaveski's Resignation and a Probe Into Alta Banka: Two Days Before the License Was Pulled in Belgrade, Mickoski Was Saying "I Don't Know If Everything Is in Order"
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
31.10.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
31.10.2026
30.10.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
31.10.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
01.11.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The war against Iran suddenly got a European address. Iran has officially accused NATO of complicity in what it describes as an illegal American-Israeli operation against its territory - and the trigger for the accusation is a statement by the alliance's own Secretary General, Mark Rutte.
In an interview on American television, Rutte revealed that 500 American aircraft took off from US bases in Italy in support of the operation named „Epic Fury", launched on February 28. According to him, the operation involved between 4,000 and 5,000 combat sorties from European bases, and alongside Italy, he named Romania as a participant too - Bucharest, he said, even cut commercial flights to make room for aerial refueling of the aircraft.
Iranian spokesman Esmail Baghaei immediately seized on the admission. „NATO's Secretary General explicitly identified Italy and Romania as participants in the aggression against Iran", he wrote, calling it an „admission of active complicity in an illegal war of aggression". Baghaei demanded that the two European countries explain to their own citizens and to the world why they're involved.
Italy quickly disowned the heavy words, claiming it had allowed only „technical and logistical flights", not operations of hundreds of combat aircraft. A classic diplomatic maneuver - being inside, while also not being quite all the way inside.
For the Balkans, this isn't abstract news. When an alliance that includes our own neighbors openly admits it's putting its bases at the disposal of a war against a third country, the question becomes concrete: where does „logistical support" end, and where does participation in war begin? And who asks the citizens of those countries whether they agree to their territory being a launch pad for someone else's conflict?
The latest 10 news from this category
A convoy corridor in Oleshky - and in the next breath the Kremlin says combat operations continue. The Balkans know...
Two Belarusians arrested in Germany, a European arrest warrant for a Ukrainian. Hybrid war has no front line - it...
The ceasefire took effect at 3 a.m. A few minutes later, Russian ballistic missiles were flying towards Kyiv. That's what...
Trump says Zelensky is a harder partner than Putin. Behind the scenes, American intelligence is sending Kyiv strike data and...
One dead, three missing, and no official cause. Before it, in October alone, drones attacked at least seven cargo ships...
Security guarantees and ten years of funding for the army - that's Kyiv's price. Putin, meanwhile, doesn't want a short-lived...
Seven sailors went missing after a drone attack on a tanker off the Romanian coast, and the union says there's...
Ukraine has revealed details of the secret offensive near Lyman: 277 square kilometres and 16 villages, but also more than...
An empty tanker, a distress call at seven in the morning and seven missing, among them a Croatian officer. Off...
Kyiv is ready to freeze the war on the current line, but not to abandon positions it spent years preparing....
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we'll write to you when there's a new guide or something new on Metla.