Janevska Wants Teachers to Step Up for Agriculture Class - But Can a Teacher Single-Handedly Fix a Field the State Abandoned?
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
24.06.2026
23.06.2026
25.06.2026
24.06.2026
23.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
25.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
24.06.2026
23.06.2026
22.06.2026
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
The war against Iran suddenly got a European address. Iran has officially accused NATO of complicity in what it describes as an illegal American-Israeli operation against its territory - and the trigger for the accusation is a statement by the alliance's own Secretary General, Mark Rutte.
In an interview on American television, Rutte revealed that 500 American aircraft took off from US bases in Italy in support of the operation named „Epic Fury", launched on February 28. According to him, the operation involved between 4,000 and 5,000 combat sorties from European bases, and alongside Italy, he named Romania as a participant too - Bucharest, he said, even cut commercial flights to make room for aerial refueling of the aircraft.
Iranian spokesman Esmail Baghaei immediately seized on the admission. „NATO's Secretary General explicitly identified Italy and Romania as participants in the aggression against Iran", he wrote, calling it an „admission of active complicity in an illegal war of aggression". Baghaei demanded that the two European countries explain to their own citizens and to the world why they're involved.
Italy quickly disowned the heavy words, claiming it had allowed only „technical and logistical flights", not operations of hundreds of combat aircraft. A classic diplomatic maneuver - being inside, while also not being quite all the way inside.
For the Balkans, this isn't abstract news. When an alliance that includes our own neighbors openly admits it's putting its bases at the disposal of a war against a third country, the question becomes concrete: where does „logistical support" end, and where does participation in war begin? And who asks the citizens of those countries whether they agree to their territory being a launch pad for someone else's conflict?
The latest 10 news from this category
Every killing is presented as a serious blow - but if that's true, why has the fight dragged on for...
The railway bridge over the North Crimean Canal, Ukrainian forces say, no longer exists. After three years of war, the...
The terminal in Kerch burns for a third day, the bridge opens and closes on someone else's decision. The Balkans...
The war that was meant to end in days now reaches the heart of Russia. Sheremetyevo shut, drones over Moscow...
The targets are the Mozyr and Naftan refineries - the reserve that replaces Russian fuel. Once a new front opens,...
Russian Su-34s dropped FAB-3000s on industrial zones. The same day Crimea burned - both strikes tell the truth: nobody wins,...
Overnight strikes on the port of Kerch, oil depots and a power plant. The war stopped being only theirs long...
For every tear of an Israeli mother, a thousand Lebanese mothers must cry, Ben-Gvir said. The arithmetic of revenge that...
Every door leads to the same place - an admission that things aren't going to plan. How long can a...
The idea of a safe rear has vanished for both sides. How long can this exchange of blows go on...