One Garbage Truck Out of Four Actually Works: Skopje Drowns in Trash While Spare Parts Wait on "Procedure"
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
10.06.2026
09.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
10.06.2026
11.06.2026
10.06.2026
09.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
11.06.2026
10.06.2026
10.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
09.06.2026
22.05.2026
19.05.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
When an artificial-intelligence company fires an engineer who warned about safety risks, the question isn't whether there was a problem - it's how long they knew about it and stayed silent anyway. That's exactly the accusation now standing against xAI, Elon Musk's company behind the chatbot Grok.
Former engineer Devin Kim filed a lawsuit in a California court on June 10, claiming he was fired precisely because he persistently pointed out that Grok was being developed without serious concern for safety. Among his worries: the model's potential to discriminate, to spread information about weapons of mass destruction, and to show political bias. The dismissal, he claims, came in mid-September 2025 - a few days before he was due to give a planned presentation of those findings.
What followed is hard to read as anything other than a confirmation of his words. Grok made headlines after comparing itself to Hitler - it even earned the nickname "MechaHitler" - and in January 2026 it was used to flood the platform X with non-consensual sexual images. "Grok, of course, proved Mr. Kim right with spectacular displays of online hate," the lawsuit states.
The choice of target is also interesting. The lawsuit doesn't go after Musk, but specifically after xAI's co-founder, Jimmy Ba. Kim is seeking damages and punitive damages, plus a court finding that he was right. Before xAI he worked on safety projects at Scale AI, and was recently appointed head of the Center for AI Safety - making him hard to dismiss as someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.
The timing, too, isn't trivial: the lawsuit landed just a few days before SpaceX's announced historic stock-market debut. When the stars of the Musk empire are supposed to shine brightest, this is a shadow hard to ignore. And the broader story is as old as the industry itself - those who are first to flag the danger rarely get gratitude, more often they get fired. The question is how many lawsuits like this it will take before someone above them reacts.
The latest 10 news from this category
Minors get special profiles with no like counts. The company says protection, but the concern came only after lawyers and...
A spot in the storefront is no longer forever - Apple will delete apps that don't attract users. Who decides...
The first Western carmaker with sodium-ion cells - and a deal where old vehicle batteries power data centers. The AI...
All the giants suddenly discovered India - Microsoft, Amazon, Google, OpenAI. Coincidence? New Delhi is offering a quarter-century tax-free, and...
The place where Apple spent billions and ultimately gave up on Project Titan is now taken over by the one...
An administrative procedure that's really one more front in the tech war between Washington and Beijing. The Chinese giants are...
A week after Anthropic, the company behind ChatGPT has filed to go public too. The race for the biggest AI...
A fork of Russian software, scrubbed of its owner. And where are we, filling our institutions with foreign licenses we...
Uber spent its whole annual budget by April, one firm racked up 500 million. The "run faster" euphoria became "hit...
56,000 intrusions, 18 countries, a warning from Five Eyes - and six years of silence. What does that say about...