„We Have Valid Permits and Can't Even Get Home”: Centar Residents Furious Over New Parking Tariffs
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
04.06.2026
03.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
05.06.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
14.04.2026
07.11.2025
07.11.2025
No news available in this category.
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
After more than four years of war, a question once unthinkable to say out loud is appearing in Russia: whether to end the war in Ukraine at all. In a media space under tight control, the mere asking of that question is a shift worth noting.
Putin remains uncompromising - he demands full control over the Donbas, shows no remorse for the decision to invade, and continues with missile and drone strikes despite economic pressure. But around him, something is shifting. The hope that Trump would broker a peace favourable to Moscow - the so-called "spirit of Anchorage" - has evaporated. Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov recently even distanced himself: "I never used that term."
Why is the tone changing? Because the bill has come due. Enormous losses on the battlefield, technological backwardness, a budget deficit, a stalled economy - and a war that has already reached Russian territory through drone strikes on refineries and the Moscow region. When the war knocks on your own door, the abstract "special operation" becomes a lot more concrete.
The voices differ. Political analyst Vasily Kashin says the goal of removing the "anti-Russian government" in Kyiv is "technically unfeasible" without full occupation. Commentator Alexander Nosovich describes a divided expert community, where some believe "the worst-case scenario isn't defeat, but endless operations." Others, like lawyer Dmitry Krasnov, console themselves with history - that Russian defeats "have regularly led to reforms and, surprisingly, new victories."
But the limits of this debate are clear. One controversial article that suggested Russia consider ending the war without achieving its goals was soon deleted from the internet - readers ran into an "Error 404" message. So much for the freedom of the new discussion.
For the Balkans, which remember well the regimes that talked in one direction while reality went in another, this is a familiar moment. When a system begins to allow questions it once banned, that's rarely a sign of openness - more often it's a sign that reality has become too heavy to hide. The question isn't whether Russia has doubts; the question is how long it will allow that doubt to be spoken.
The latest 10 news from this category
600 sailors with no beds, 30 hours of fighting the fire by hand. If the most expensive warship of the...
When allies insult each other over the phone, the question isn't whether the ceasefire is fragile - it's how long...
The crown princess has used oxygen for years. Haakon is cancelling everything - Japan, Stockholm, a silver anniversary - over...
Strawberry-farm workers promised a wage they never saw. 14 arson attacks in a few months. The Europe that lives off...
215 to 208, with four Republicans against their own president. The resolution demands withdrawal from Iran, but Trump has the...
Groups with headlamps and fishing waders go underground and come back hours later. Even in the world's biggest city, the...
A number without context is a weapon, not information. The Chinese jets beat the European ones only because the match...
The difference between "the US returned to the forum" and "America knelt" is the difference between journalism and propaganda. When...
After the drone strikes during the conflict with Iran, the emirate is chasing tourists with discounts. For someone from Beirut,...
With threats and sanctions, Washington achieved what years of warnings couldn't. Brussels is preparing a tech-sovereignty package. And what do...