The Video Found Them in a Day: Two Minors and a 20-Year-Old Suspected in the Brutal Gostivar Beating
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
03.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
03.08.2026
02.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
04.08.2026
03.08.2026
03.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
After more than four years of war, a question once unthinkable to say out loud is appearing in Russia: whether to end the war in Ukraine at all. In a media space under tight control, the mere asking of that question is a shift worth noting.
Putin remains uncompromising - he demands full control over the Donbas, shows no remorse for the decision to invade, and continues with missile and drone strikes despite economic pressure. But around him, something is shifting. The hope that Trump would broker a peace favourable to Moscow - the so-called "spirit of Anchorage" - has evaporated. Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov recently even distanced himself: "I never used that term."
Why is the tone changing? Because the bill has come due. Enormous losses on the battlefield, technological backwardness, a budget deficit, a stalled economy - and a war that has already reached Russian territory through drone strikes on refineries and the Moscow region. When the war knocks on your own door, the abstract "special operation" becomes a lot more concrete.
The voices differ. Political analyst Vasily Kashin says the goal of removing the "anti-Russian government" in Kyiv is "technically unfeasible" without full occupation. Commentator Alexander Nosovich describes a divided expert community, where some believe "the worst-case scenario isn't defeat, but endless operations." Others, like lawyer Dmitry Krasnov, console themselves with history - that Russian defeats "have regularly led to reforms and, surprisingly, new victories."
But the limits of this debate are clear. One controversial article that suggested Russia consider ending the war without achieving its goals was soon deleted from the internet - readers ran into an "Error 404" message. So much for the freedom of the new discussion.
For the Balkans, which remember well the regimes that talked in one direction while reality went in another, this is a familiar moment. When a system begins to allow questions it once banned, that's rarely a sign of openness - more often it's a sign that reality has become too heavy to hide. The question isn't whether Russia has doubts; the question is how long it will allow that doubt to be spoken.
The latest 10 news from this category
The same sea, the same week, three figures that differ eightfold. And Europe's first concrete move is Italy closing its...
Two to nine cents per kilowatt-hour, against a global average of 17. The promise is clean power; the condition Bavaria...
Ghana, Senegal, Libya, Uganda... and Montenegro. The two Balkan countries knocking loudest on the EU's door are being considered as...
A one-point gap is not an earthquake. But when it is the first in nearly ten years, the trend matters...
Two men who professionally impersonate other people claim what Merkel told them. The problem for the story is that the...
One more centimetre down and Paks stops completely for the first time in 44 years. Not because of a fault...
Aliases, maps to buried weapons, a handler on an encrypted app. Europol is tracking a model in which the young...
The "jets for drones" deal hung in the air for months. The moment Sofia showed interest in the same fighters,...
The EU fertility rate has fallen to 1.34 children per woman, and in South Korea nurseries are being converted into...
German factories are already cutting output because the river is not there. When Europe counts the damage in billions, it...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.