A cocked pistol on the road near Krushopek: the line between a police bulletin and a funeral was held by somebody else's nerve
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
06.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
05.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
07.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
07.08.2026
06.08.2026
05.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Volodymyr Zelensky arrives in Belgrade on Saturday - the first bilateral visit by a Ukrainian president to Serbia since the war began. The question everyone asked straight away was different from the agenda: does this mean Serbia is finally joining the European sanctions against Russia?
Aleksandar Vučić's answer was carefully assembled. Serbia, he said, has established its policy; it set out its positions four years ago, hasn't changed them and won't be changing them. Zelensky will say his piece. The sentence is built so that it promises nothing and refuses nothing directly either.
Three topics and one that's missing
The official agenda has three items: the European path of both countries and shared challenges, economic cooperation, and energy. Of those three, the third is the reason the whole visit is interesting. Energy is precisely where Serbia's policy of non-alignment is most expensive and hardest to sustain.
Vučić also recalled something rarely mentioned in a Western context - that Ukraine has never recognised Kosovo and has never invited representatives from Pristina to conferences it organised. That is not a footnote in Serbia's domestic ledger. It is the reason this visit can be defended at home without looking like a concession.
For us here, the mechanics are the valuable part. A state that wants into the European Union but doesn't want to accept its sanctions has to answer the question at some point instead of postponing it. So far, postponing has worked. The question is how long one visit can stand in for one answer.
Macedonia introduced the sanctions without much debate, and it didn't open a single door any faster. Serbia didn't introduce them and is still negotiating. Neither experience yields a lesson about who was smarter - it only yields the fact that conditions rarely determine outcomes. What decides is who is needed, how badly, and by whom.
The latest 10 news from this category
No law requires the resignation - Vučić is offering it himself. Except the office is what gets vacated, while the...
Belgrade has spent decades walking a tightrope strung between Moscow and the West. On 8 August that rope gets pulled...
Somebody posted it proudly, and the same hand pulled it down once they saw how it looked from the outside....
There was organised transport, there were calls to turn out in numbers, and there was almost no audience. Only the...
Milanovic went after NATO and the allies selling weapons to Serbia. Plenkovic went further - he called the operation after...
The state provided the stage, the microphone and the buses - but not the audience. The gathering in Mrkonjić Grad...
Inflow dropped to a historic low of 1,450 cubic metres per second, and electricity passed 500 euros per megawatt-hour. Hydropower...
Journalist Dejana Kljajić remembers the days after 4 August 1995 from Knin. The most uncomfortable part of her account is...
Export licences in four days, 38 cargo flights in a single year and a 1.6 billion dollar deal to manufacture...
Four days for the permit, two years to go from 540,000 to 114 million euros in exports. Combat drones built...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.