The Stone Dolls Had Their Own Toll Booth: Detention for the Woman Who Seized Kuklica
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
04.08.2026
04.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
04.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
04.08.2026
03.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
05.08.2026
09.03.2026
27.02.2026
19.02.2026
05.08.2026
04.08.2026
03.08.2026
23.04.2026
23.04.2026
12.04.2026
Serbia is discovering the most uncomfortable thing about energy independence: it depends on how much water is in one river. And the river has dried up.
Đerdap, Serbia's largest hydropower plant, is running at just a quarter of its capacity. According to the minister of mining and energy, water inflow at Đerdap fell on Monday to „historically low levels of only 1,450 cubic metres per second”. Not a breakdown, not maintenance, not a sanction. The Danube simply does not have enough water.
The consequence shows up immediately in the price. Electricity on the exchange passed 500 euros per megawatt-hour - a level not seen since the energy crisis of 2022. The government admits that whatever is missing has to be bought on market terms, which translates as: at a price somebody else sets.
Thermal plants instead of water
The gap is being covered by the coal plants at Kostolac and „Nikola Tesla” in Obrenovac. The Perućac pumped-storage plant on the Drina holds reserves of 140 gigawatts, officially „enough to respond to unforeseen circumstances”.
The phrasing is accurate and slightly disingenuous at the same time. When a state explains how well prepared it is for unforeseen circumstances, it usually means the circumstance has already arrived.
Heat that will not let up
On top of all this came the heatwave. Serbia issued a red warning for temperatures between 37 and 39 degrees, with up to 48 expected in direct sunlight. Forecasts bring no relief before the end of the week - which means electricity consumption for cooling will rise on exactly the days when production is weakest.
Then there is the broader question, which concerns the whole region: for decades hydropower was sold as a stable, clean and domestic source. That was true while the climate behaved predictably. When a river cuts its flow to a quarter of what was expected, „domestic source” survives only on paper, and the bill is settled on the European exchange.
Has anyone here run the same scenarios for our own hydropower plants, or are we also waiting for the river to recede first and do the maths afterwards?
The latest 10 news from this category
The state provided the stage, the microphone and the buses - but not the audience. The gathering in Mrkonjić Grad...
Journalist Dejana Kljajić remembers the days after 4 August 1995 from Knin. The most uncomfortable part of her account is...
Export licences in four days, 38 cargo flights in a single year and a 1.6 billion dollar deal to manufacture...
Four days for the permit, two years to go from 540,000 to 114 million euros in exports. Combat drones built...
The lowest inflows since 2003, while Hungary and Romania shut down reactors because the Danube does not have enough water...
Thirty centimetres separate a functioning country from a country in trouble. And in the same broadcast, the blame for the...
It wasn't Hungary and Slovakia. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Greece and Portugal reshaped the package - each protecting something of...
Zeta and Pljevlja passed it, the pro-Serbian bloc's safest stronghold did not. When recognition of Kosovo collides with an EU...
He admits everything and says he would do it again. The prosecution claims he planned it for months - while...
A court in Split ruled on crimes committed between 1991 and 1995. Four hundred and fifty witnesses, three thousand documents...
This site uses cookies - is that okay? Learn more
Be the first to know when Metla launches something new
Leave your email and we will write when there is a new guide or something new on Metla.